On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas <zo...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun Jan 29, 2012 at 20:40:57 +0100, Poison Bit wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Stephen Gran <sg...@debian.org> wrote: >> Second, a suggestion or some brain dump about ideas on howto improve >> the issues communication: >> >> I imagine the scenario, where some DD is trying to work from any >> place in the world. Nowadays, there are many points to check if a >> service is not working... is it my last upgrade? is it my last config >> change? is it my ISP? is it some intermediate ISP? is it the service >> that is really down? of course, this kind of email notifications are >> just fine to notify a known issue. >> >> So I ask myself... the reason to do not run "any" public monitoring >> system, is much increase in the workload of the sysadmins ? There are >> different approaches to do it... > > There is a monitoring, but it seems most DDs and non-DDs do not care and > start to pester the admins directly [1]. > > URL and access to the monitoring is documented publicly.
Do you mean: http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi If so, it's not reporting vasks as down, but that still seems to be the case. If you're referring to something else, I'd love to know about it. Thanks! -- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio Ubuntu Developer <https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething> Debian Maintainer <http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=a.starr.b%40gmail.com> PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cal6k_axnob1z_gx9owp5bag_u-uzofbfg8vp2xa2sc2jp0n...@mail.gmail.com
