On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:59:14 -0800, Ansgar Burchardt <ans...@debian.org> wrote:
We propose to use the BTS to handle sponsoring requests. Both sponsorees and sponsors should already be familiar with its usage and we hope it will improve the sponsoring process for both sides. It will also make it easier to analyse sponsoring (e.g. number of requests without a response).
As a non-developer, I really like this idea. Just a note, though: the non-automatic subscription behavior of the BTS could confuse new potential package maintainers, as they might not subscribe to the corresponding bug (this has happened to me). This should be noted in the documentation. In other issue tracking systems, the requester is automatically notified of any response or follow-up in the reported case. Best regards. -- Octavio. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/op.v8j7kpqp4oyyg1@alvarezp-ws
