* Russell Coker <[email protected]> schrieb: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2011, Tanguy Ortolo <[email protected]> wrote: > > I tend to agree. At least, this is how I interpret the FHS, and it seems > > appropriate to me. Although it may not be useful in most cases, I do not > > see it as harmful. > > The harm is if it takes us extra development time because other distributions > don't support it, provide configuration options for it, or test it.
Hmm, AFAIK Gentoo still is FHS compliant in this regard. Ubuntu too. No idea what SuSE does, but who really cares what these windows imitator jerks do ? ;-o > Things have changed a lot since the FSSTD first came out. True. But the need for quick and easy system maintenance remains. cu -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ phone: +49 36207 519931 email: [email protected] mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
