On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:48:00AM +0700, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > On 11-12-13 at 03:10pm, Kees Cook wrote: > > Notably, I'm curious about this: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651964 > > > > I think this is broken behavior on CDBS's part, and that the "some > > packages" mentioned should be fixed so that all the other packages > > aren't hampered by the problem. > > I would be happy to change CDBS to always behave sanely (i.e. make > CDBS_FIX_COMPILE_FLAGS=1 the default behaviour). > > This wouldm however, require someone to do the work of investigating and > correcting any and all packages in the Debian archive that depends on > the older arguably broken behaviour.
I'd be happy to help getting some bugs opened and doing rebuild tests. Is the failure condition easy to spot? -Kees -- Kees Cook @debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111214203809.gq5...@outflux.net
