On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 10:40:36 +0100 Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-...@web.de> wrote:
> Igor Pashev <pashev.i...@gmail.com> writes: > > > 07.12.2011 04:43, Marco d'Itri пишет: > >> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/hotplug/udev.git;a=commitdiff;h=12a362be5c1982f80dbfb75bda070208a2c99cdf > >> > >> Discuss. > >> > > I don't see any reason to move all into /usr from /, > > and make initrd for minimal system: > The initramfs on the other hand is made to fit. So if /usr isn't on a > networking filesystem (NFS) then you won't get networking stuff in the > initramfs. No raid then mdadm isn't included. No lvm and the initramfs > gets smaller again. And only select modules for one kernel are in > there. Huge space saving again. So an initramfs will/can be minimal. I assume this means it will be impossible to swap the hdd from one system to another without rebuilding the initramfs? Seems like a step backwards for flexability. thanks, kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK7FOSS) http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
