Am 03.11.2011 21:47, schrieb Ben Hutchings: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 07:21:59PM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: >> On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 at 22:58:38 +0400, Igor Pashev wrote: >>> Isn't /usr/libexec for "internal use" exetutables? >> >> In the GNU coding standards and on Red Hat-based distributions, yes; in the >> FHS (and hence Debian), no. (libexec isn't specified by the FHS.) > > Is there any movement to fix this (by specifying /usr/libexec) now > that FHS is being updated?
The 3.0 draft does contain /usr/libexec -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
