Fabian Greffrath, le Wed 31 Aug 2011 16:21:34 +0200, a écrit : > >ifupdown 0.7~alpha5 was uploaded to unstable rather than experimental by > >mistake. Since version numbers aren't allowed to go backwards, we now > >have 0.7~alpha5+really0.6.15 in unstable, but for the purposes of > > Don't we have epochs for this? I know they are annoying and should be > avoided, but they are still a blessing compared to the current confused > versioning scheme.
Epochs are permanent annoying things, while this kind of confusion is only temporary. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
