Wolodja Wentland <babi...@gmail.com> (30/08/2011): > It is my impression that the problems mentioned in my initial mail can > be solved by changing metapackages (like those mentioned by Cyril in > his reply) to use Recommends instead of Depends. > > I am, however, not entirely sure if there are any good reasons for not > doing this and therefore hoped to spur a discussion of this topic. > What is problematic about this change or a general suggestion that > metapackages should use Recommends instead of Depends?
If you do that, you lose the distinction between packages that are absolutely required, and those that are only a recommendation, and can be skipped by the experienced users. If you look at xfce4, you can see it pulls by default xorg (which pulls in turn an X server and drivers), and a few extra items which are not strictly needed. For example, if you want to run xfce4 with an exported display, you don't really need an X server. Or desktop-base support. So if you know what you're doing, you can still use the meta package to pull the Depends, but skip some if not all Recommends. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature