On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 09:38:04PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Jul 19, Wouter Verhelst <wou...@debian.org> wrote: > > kFreeBSD is currently released as a "technology preview". With that, we > > mean it works, but it isn't necessarily ready yet for prime usage. The > > fact that there currently aren't many users yet isn't surprising in that > > light. However, as the port matures, it's not unthinkable that there > > will be many more users. > Again, why? > So far we have one person who likes pf and one who suspects that maybe > FreeBSD could behave better when severely overloaded.
Oh, I get it, we should throw kFreeBSD out because Marco d'Itri thinks it's a bad idea? In less than a day, you've had two people come up with, for them, good arguments. Another oft-quoted argument for kFreeBSD is ZFS (which does indeed have some very nice features). Granted, this isn't a scientifically valid poll, but come on, it's a troll thread on a development mailinglist, what do you expect? > > Frankly, I'd be somewhat surprised if some time after the release of > > wheezy (but still before wheezy+1), usage of Debian kFreeBSD did not > > surpass that of the i386 port. > And do you have any data to justify this prediction or did you see it in > the crystal ball? Call it "gut feeling". -- The volume of a pizza of thickness a and radius z can be described by the following formula: pi zz a -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110719194710.gc6...@grep.be
