On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Gergely Nagy <alger...@balabit.hu> wrote: > Federico Di Gregorio <f...@debian.org> writes: > >> On 18/07/11 12:13, Samuel Thibault wrote: >>> Jon Dowland, le Mon 18 Jul 2011 10:35:30 +0100, a écrit : >>>> 1. carry portability patches against systemd locally >>>> 2. support multiple init systems >>>> 3. drop kfreebsd (and HURD and others) >>> >>> 3 basically means dropping "Universal" from Debian, and replace it with >>> "Linux". >> >> Wasn't "universal" as in "runs everywhere" (i.e., on a lot of archs) vs >> as "runs everything" (when a Debian GNU/WinNT?). > > The main issue I have with dropping kFreeBSD & HURD would be (apart from > losing two platforms I use - even if for fun only; I don't want to use a > distribution that doesn't allow me to have as much fun as I do now) that > it leads down the path of dropping whatever a vocal upstream decides to > don't care about. > > What if next year $upstream_of_an_important_package decides that he only > cares about amd64 and arm? The rest of the world is obsolete anyway...
What about also embeded marked ? Projection says what consumer will use more embeded software than desktop in the next years. Systemd seems pretty non modular and too heavy weight for this, at least for now. > > Would Debian drop i386, ppc, mips and the rest? > > -- > |8] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87zkkbhmbh....@balabit.hu > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAE2SPAZj=-pMMsXjgVGRWZ9A91zE1K=ghgncg5dmdhmpo0m...@mail.gmail.com
