I forgot to CC debian-hurd, please follow-up there too. 2011/7/16 Robert Millan <r...@debian.org>: > Title and template description (below) is self-explanatory. 156 > packages are affected (list is attached). > > Package: %package% > Severity: wishlist > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: kfreebsd > > The debian/control file in %package% uses a negated list of architectures > to specify a package relationship (most likely Build-Depends) on a > Linux-specific package. I.e. something like: > > Build-Depends: libfoo-dev [!kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64 !hurd-i386] > > This is problematic because it will fail for any future kfreebsd-* or hurd-* > architecture (like the upcoming kfreebsd-mipsel port). The correct way > would be to use dpkg architecture wildcards, e.g.: > > Build-Depends: libfoo-dev [linux-any] > > Please consider making this adjustment to make life easier for future > porting efforts. > > -- > Robert Millan >
-- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxp7z40-k64aqxperefes7osh9t7_gww_qcvf5lmxt9...@mail.gmail.com
