On Mon, 06 Jun 2011, Philipp Kern wrote: > I.e. I think we should still allow non-buildd binaries, e.g. for > those cases you mentioned.
Non-buildd binaries should still be allowed, but they should be followed immediately by a binNMU. [Are there any cases where we wouldn't want to rebuild the package after it was bootstrapped?] Don Armstrong -- Identical parts aren't. -- Beach's Law http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110607022454.gu4...@rzlab.ucr.edu
