Andy Guy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It is different becuase the lzw patent holders (HP?) have given a > general license for non-profit use of the patent.
That's true. It's Unisys that holds the patent, btw. The patent on bzip is moot anyway, as bzip2 does not have any patents on it. It should go to main. I think we should discourage the use of bzip by not having it in the archive. Someone mentioned that there was a bunzip which could go to non-free? Guy -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .