On Mon, 30 May 2011, Osamu Aoki wrote: > I looked into Debian policy and developers-reference just to be sure. > Then, I realized that it may be a good idea to make a longer list of > packages for packaging as long as it is properly maintained together with > the list in the developers-reference APPENDIX.
I disagree, the appendix of the developers-reference has really grown somewhat arbitrarily and has not been correctly maintained over time. The fact that the developers reference is maintained by a group doesn't make it perfect. And I certainly don't see a compelling reason to require that this new meta-package be maintained by the editors of the developers reference. > A.3.3. yada (maybe as dh-make|yada) This alone proves my point. :-) Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English) ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110529191837.gb22...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com
