Hi, I currently see a wild mix of different format definitions used by people hitting debian-mentors. While I personally don't care as long as the copyright file is complete I don't think this fulfills the goal of this DEP.
It would be nice if the involved people would clarify what should be used. So far I've seen the following referenced: a) SVN revisions of the mdwn file (seems to be ok) b) http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ (seems to be not that wrong but exactly this current document claims that a revision of the mdwn file should be used) c) a wiki page (rejected that one, seems wrong to me) d) broken links (obviously rejected) TIA, Sven -- And I don't know much, but I do know this: With a golden heart comes a rebel fist. [ Streetlight Manifesto - Here's To Life ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110529115729.GB18249@marvin
