Am Mittwoch, den 25.05.2011, 14:49 +0200 schrieb Tshepang Lekhonkhobe: > On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 23:51 +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > Am Samstag, den 21.05.2011, 21:41 +0200 schrieb Tshepang Lekhonkhobe: > > > On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 00:26 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 12:26 -0500 schrieb James Vega: > > > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Benjamin Drung <bdr...@debian.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 00:05 +0000 schrieb Roger Leigh: > > > > > >> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:01:12PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > > > > > >> > Should these script moved from ubuntu-dev-tools into devscripts? > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > Most of the script are written in Python. Rewriting them to get > > > > > >> > them > > > > > >> > included in devscripts is too much work without benefit. > > > > > >> > devscripts > > > > > >> > would depend on python then. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Most of the scripts are short. Rewriting would be fairly simple, > > > > > >> and > > > > > >> may be beneficial in removing the Ubuntu-specific bits. > > > > > > > > > > > > What speaks against having these script in python? Is python too > > > > > > heavy > > > > > > for a _development_ machine? > > > > > > > > > > It's not just about a package dependency. It's more about restricting > > > > > the knowledge base required for those maintaining the package. > > > > > > > > > > Considering that scripts are contributed to devscripts and the support > > > > > burden is then commonly left on the shoulders of those maintaining > > > > > devscripts instead of the original script author, it's in our interest > > > > > to maintain a consistent set of languages that we are willing to > > > > > support. This is currently Perl and shell. > > > > > > > > > > So yes, IMO, accepting scripts written in Python (or any other > > > > > language) > > > > > is too heavy. Not for a "_development_ machine", but for a > > > > > maintenance > > > > > team. If people choose to ignore our requirement and develop scripts > > > > > in > > > > > other languages, then they can deal with the consequences. > > > > > > > > Stefano Rivera (stefanor) and I offer to maintain the Python scripts in > > > > devscripts. Is it enough to have at two DDs to support Python? > > > > > > Has this issue been resolved? Has this question been answered by > > > devscripts maintainers? > > > > We managed to alleviate the concerns / weaken the resistance. The two > > Python scripts suspicious-source and wrap-and-sort landed in the > > devscripts git master branch and will be included in the upcoming > > upload. > > Okay, thanks. > > What about the rest? Is this discussed some place public? This thread > makes it look like there was indecision. What did I miss?
The discussion from debian-devel was continued on pkg-devscri...@teams.debian.net and on IRC (#devscripts on OTFC). The scripts that should be moved where discussed at the UDS-o in Budapest [1]. [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu-dev-tools/+spec/other-o-udt-upstreaming -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
