On Sat, 21 May 2011 17:22:05 +0200, Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> wrote: >A similar issue (not directly IPv6 related) was discussed on fedora-devel not >very long ago. It was about the more "dynamic" nature of NetworkManager and how >certain services currently don't cope with the network not being up and fully >configured, when they start up. [1] > >See some suggestions how to address this are at [2].
That article says that servers should use FREEBIND or subscribe to netlink for changes. This is a major effort which needs upstream cooperation or local patches. The third option suggests that the network manager option mentioned there is what one would need for ifupdown, and I don't have the slightest idea how one could guess whether the networks is "done" now. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qnrf3-0003gd...@swivel.zugschlus.de
