On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 13:58:08 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > We basically know the reasons on both sides. Most objections are of > social nature (fear of "APT has a Pre-Depends, let's add one to"), and > Eugene thinks it is unfair if APT were to pre-depend on things while > Cupt would not, ignoring the differences in numbers of users and > priority (important vs optional). > Err, no. One of the objections, IIRC, was that adding pre-depends doesn't improve anything for anyone, since apt already considers itself essential internally.
Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110520172444.gb2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
