On Tue, 17 May 2011, Matthias Klose wrote: > >Assuming we can't just do away with i486 support for now, did anyone track > >down exactly what was causing breakages that forced the change from > >march=486 to march=586? > > libgomp assumes 586; there were some GFortran/OMP issues on i386.
"assumes 586" is pretty damn vague. Does it use 586-only instructions, or what? I have no strong opinions about dropping i486 or not. All boxes I could ever care about, even at work, are either amd64 or i686. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110518004514.ga2...@khazad-dum.debian.net
