Christoph Anton Mitterer <christoph.anton.mitte...@physik.uni-muenchen.de> writes:
> Phew I guess there are already some requests against the policy open,.. > both for this config-file-weirdness and for adhering to the (not so > unreasonable) LSB exit codes. > I've followed this some time and most arguments against these changes > seemed (at least to me) to be rooted in avoiding work (e.g. as it would > be then necessary to improve the init-scripts and make them "fully" > configurable via their respective /etc/default/foo). > Anyway,.. there probably won't be any progress soon. Yes, I think it's very unlikely that any of this will change in Debian; it's much more likely that Debian will migrate, at least partially, away from SysV init scripts entirely towards something like upstart or systemd, which make all of those proposals moot. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87d3jib5g9....@windlord.stanford.edu
