On Thu, 05 May 2011 17:46:34 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > Yeah, experimental is not really the good place. We really want in > > rolling only packages where we have the assurance that they will land > > in unstable the day after the release (so automatically and not with > > a manual source upload).
Ack, especially in the "automatic" part. > Isn't the ability to "copy" .changes file around suites a completely > orthogonal problem? I'd love to have the ability, on demand, to > "upload" a package which is currently in experimental to unstable, no > matter rolling. Putting my pkg-perl hat on: Manually "moving" packages doesn't scale for almost 2000 packages in total and ~5 new upstream releases per day. I'd really love a clean possibility to (1) upload new upstream release during the freeze (2) without "polluting" unstable as the staging area for RC bugs fixes in testing and (3) auto-migration after the thaw. If this means redefining experimental (and using PPAs for the current experimental uploads) or creating a new unstable-next suite as proposed by Raphaël doesn't look crucial to me. Cheers, gregor, who enjoys this constructive discussion -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - PGP/GPG key ID: 0x8649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, & developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Funny Van Dannen: Sexualitaet
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
