"Steve M. Robbins" <st...@sumost.ca> wrote: Hi,
> I'm with Linus on this: let's just revert to the old behaviour. A > tiny amount of clock cycles saved isn't worth the instability. Tiny amount?! The optimized memcpy() variants that break shitty code bring a 4 to 5x speedup on the processors they've been written for! JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <jbla...@debian.org> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87d3jyn4gx....@sonic.technologeek.org
