* Lucas Nussbaum (lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net) [110503 11:47]: > On 02/05/11 at 16:19 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net> writes: > > > > > [ Note that my position is based on the assumption that we have a share > > > of DDs interested in rolling similar to the share of DDs interested in > > > stable releases. Unfortunately, it's very difficult to know where we > > > stand regarding this. ] > > > > I'm very dubious. To take one example, if Debian stopped making stable > > releases, it would no longer be usable at work, which would mean that my > > ability to work in Debian would substantially decrease and quite possibly > > go away completely. > > Except for the sake of argumentation, I don't think that anybody > considers seriously that Debian would stop making stable releases. > The question is whether we want to provide a rolling release in addition > to our stable releases.
<20110501133957.ga13...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com> sounds to me like we will loose quite some man-power for making stable releases. This could equally well mean we can't do some. If it is guranteed that stable release don't become harder / uglier, I don't think anybody has any reservations to adding new suites. However, as long as the general impression is "making stable releases will get way harder", that's different. Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110503192328.gq15...@mails.so.argh.org
