Neil Williams <codeh...@debian.org> wrote: [...] > I'm now getting patches from Ubuntu to catch up the effects of this old > Release Goal. I fully support the removal of .la files [0] but it would > be good if we could refresh the original goal so that .la files can be > removed rather than applying a piece-meal set of patches to only > certain packages which have been spotted independently. That way leads > only to pain.
> Let's try and handle the .la file issue across all of Debian. > Andreas: the process you used to create the initial list - is that > available as a script somewhere? Can it be re-run? Can the updated > output be filtered for the libraries which can have the .la files > removed immediately and then passed through dd-list? [...] Afaiu the script output http://release.debian.org/~aba/la/current.txt is automatically updated. e.g. libvmime (fixed 2011-03-07) is not included anymore. Combine the script output with http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00808.html to get up-to-date instructions. cu andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/9aom68-6nf....@argenau.downhill.at.eu.org
