On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 04:18:34PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[...]
> The above is just an idea, little more than a brain-dump, for
> finding a compromise among the real needs of people with bandwidth
> problem and the social issues revolving around developer
> sloppiness.
[...]
I expect part of the concern on both sides simply resolves around
conservation, doing "the right thing" as a project and not wasting
Internet/computing resources (I know bandwidth is much more of a
commodity these days, but lots of people are still instilled with
the careful principles of yesteryear).
One possible compromise which I think was already mentioned in one
of the earlier discussions (but now I can't find a reference) was to
initially attempt builds of source-only uploads on one arch and
delay building on the rest until it was proven not to FTBFS. This
strikes a balance between wasting buildd resources and not assuming
devs are irresponsibly sloppy (disclaimer: this was not my
impression of course, and IANADD anyway). It probably increases
latency for package entry into the archive, but any uploader
concerned about that can simply do a normal upload including their
locally-built binary packages to vouch for buildablity of the
source.
--
{ IRL(Jeremy_Stanley); WWW(http://fungi.yuggoth.org/); PGP(43495829);
WHOIS(STANL3-ARIN); SMTP(fu...@yuggoth.org); FINGER(fu...@yuggoth.org);
MUD(kin...@katarsis.mudpy.org:6669); IRC(fu...@irc.yuggoth.org#ccl);
ICQ(114362511); YAHOO(crawlingchaoslabs); AIM(dreadazathoth); }
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110330155231.go1...@yuggoth.org
