On 2011-03-28, Wouter Verhelst <w...@uter.be> wrote: > But I'd think that "making sure this buildd host can still do uploads in > a timely manner when the key expires" is pretty well inside the realm of > the buildd admin's responsibility.
And manual signing wouldn't be timely? I talked with Joerg at the meeting and we agreed that arch-based admin keyrings aren't needed. If you feel so strongly about it, I think you should take it up yourself and make [0] support one keyring per arch. (Or get Joerg to do it. As I told him that he doesn't need to consider it in the initial design it feels unfair to me to ask him now. Either way, if it isn't done, you don't feel strongly enough about it. There's no policy decision in the way this time.) I still don't think it's necessary, as it will be mostly identical on all archs and we'll be doing the work anyway but frankly I don't care, as long as the keys are following the rules the ftp-masters set for them. We'll still monitor the expiry and if you don't react quickly enough do it ourselves. Kind regards Philipp Kern [0] scripts/debian/buildd-* in http://ftp-master.debian.org/git/dak.git/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrnip22bk.3f0.tr...@kelgar.0x539.de
