Simon McVittie wrote:

> Or are you saying
> that things with special::auto-inst-parts should never have even a weakened
> dependency on the package of which they're an implementation detail?

Yes.  (Well, a Suggests is okay.)

> In situations where the data and the engine have a many-to-many relationship
> (the various Doom engines, each of which can play Doom, Doom II, FreeDoom or
> FreeDM), I agree that that Recommends might be too strong.

That's why I care.[1]

It seems unlikely that another game is going to start using openarena's
data without the engine but still it is nice to leave the possibility
open.

Regards,
Jonathan

[1] The package now called suckless-tools used to Recommends: dwm,
since its raison d'ĂȘtre was to provide basic functionality for that
window manager.  This meant:

 - for dwm users, not much.  APT's "markauto" functionality already
   ensured that dwm-tools would be uninstalled once dwm is removed.

 - for xmonad users, installing dwm-tools for dmenu would pull in an
   extra window manager.

(Side note: suckless-tools is plenty of fun on its own anyway.)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110321191822.GA4051@elie

Reply via email to