On Sun, 7 Dec 1997, Mark Baker wrote:

> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>       [EMAIL PROTECTED] (G John Lapeyre) writes:
> 
> > Recipes generators and the linux system 'random', which is the longer
> 
> Do you mean the library call random? No, that isn't brilliant, though if you
> try other unixes you'll probably find them worse. Apparently /dev/random is
> very good.

I heard the /dev/random files were seeded with real random data from
things like network IO interrupt calls and so forth. I've never seen any
distribution tests on the data though.

Jason


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . 
Trouble?  e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

Reply via email to