On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 09:54, Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> wrote: > On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> > While a review on -devel (and in general sharing news about his plans) is >> > always welcome, I really don't see the point of bringing this up as if it >> > was a big violation of a rule. >> >> Never said it's a 'big violation'. The fact is: we have a rule, we >> pointed out many times (in particular to new contributors to Debian) >> that filing many bugs without consulting d-devel is bad, so I'd like >> to know if there's a reason this rule was not followed in this case. >> Is this wrong? > > The point of this rule is to avoid useless MBF, and/or MBF for changes > that are not agreed upon. > > Do you have any such concern? > > Otherwise you're just losing our time in useless discussions of > administrative rules.
Ok, so I took a note that if a maintainer believe he's doing a MBF for the good, there's no need to consult -devel . > PS: Yes this is all tainted by your regular attacks of Matthias. Would > someone else have asked the very same question, it could have been > interpreted differently. Thanks for conducting this discussion constructively. Regards, -- Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=pkrpyrugmntiaz0lzp5yuqoydaejfo5nrn...@mail.gmail.com
