Le dimanche 27 février 2011 16:31:29, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > But then, we have a problem, because: > - ruby-foo need one of (ruby1.8-foo, ruby1.9.1-foo, jruby-foo, > rubinius-foo) installed to work correctly
ok > - ruby1.8-foo, ruby1.9.1-foo, jruby-foo, rubinius-foo need ruby-foo > installed Correct me if I'm wrong, but ruby1.8-foo, ruby1.9.1-foo, jruby-foo are not broken without ruby-foo, they're just useless. So this may be interpreted as not being a dependency. Moreover, I have the impression that any ruby package needing foo *functionality* will depend on ruby-foo and not on any arch/interpreter specific package. In this case the dependency between ruby1.8-foo, ruby1.9.1- foo, jruby-foo, rubinius-foo will probably never be actually used .. Thoughts ? HTH Dominique -- http://config-model.wiki.sourceforge.net/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/ddumont -o- http://ddumont.wordpress.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201103012235.46134.domi.dum...@free.fr
