Hi, 2011/2/28 Tollef Fog Heen <tfh...@err.no>: > ]] Hector Oron
> | > * Raising the severity doesn't really imply anything > | > | True. Would you suggest some better way to proceed with porter-NMU? > I would think it quite rushed to be pushing NMUs for an archicture not > in Debian and not even in dpkg yet. Even more so when it's not accepted > as a release goal for wheezy. Thanks for the comments. >From my point of view, it is not rushed, but we might be more noisy about it, we are working in the port since spring last year (almost a year) and most than 90% of the port is completed. I plan to post an update on that soon(ish). Regarding `dpkg', there are technical issues about adding the architecture as `dpkg' only provides one-to-one mappings between architectures, and here we have a case were two different Debian architectures (two different ABI) map into one single triplet. There is on-going effort to solve that problem. Thanks to `dpkg' maintainers. Please read DebianBug#594179 for more information. Even more, there is no yet a decision if the architecture is accepted or not in the "official" archive, we have not requested such thing (yet) as we do not meet archive criteria for now. But as other unofficial ports, I guess it is correct to add support for it into packages. Best regards, -- Héctor Orón "Our Sun unleashes tremendous flares expelling hot gas into the Solar System, which one day will disconnect us." -- Day DVB-T stop working nicely Video flare: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap100510.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTi=ypdhaeztkyjoomfuktg4rpfw+kfsxi92g3...@mail.gmail.com
