-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Darren/Torin/Who Ever... wrote: > I was going to change perl to perl5 think weekend and just provide the > virtual package perl. This would close a bug filed by Brian White who > is worried about Perl6. While I was thinking about this during builds > of Perl, I realized that I can't do that right now. The problem? dpkg > doesn't support versions on virtual packages. Too many things depend on > a specific version of Perl to just tell people to fix things up. > > What does everyone else think?
If perl6 is not going to be ready for Debian 2.0, I think it is too soon to worry about. The Breaks: field could be another (nicer, IMHO) solution for this. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: latin1 iQCVAgUBNIfqmCqK7IlOjMLFAQEJUwP/dmze4eT0ADBqGdv5lZOlCm7XonGaELSk 6lxb4ljB8hvT96JBF8iem5NRbZu1JzTijK2YWCuUR8ol1KBBEz10Fg1O0fY539ou EXRtBRKvDGF8B0vavmwIGRH+f3Ky5oz2bdSon9+PhNbsIiIfpnOcZcac85wkhXEn DPM1Rs6CWEc= =BJ3G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
