On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:30:05AM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote: > I've now implemented this with the attached patch. If you are happy > with this behaviour, I'll commit it. Those six lines are equivalent > to about 300 in the internal resolver! With this change made, would > you be OK to consider moving over to the apt resolver on the buildds? > At this point it's pretty much identical in every way that matters, > certainly from empirical testing.
Apart from the usual "stuff will break when we merge the branch" issue, yes. And buildd needs to get some touches to support resolve-alternatives. (The backwards compatible way would be, for buildd, resolve-alternatives=true for resolver=aptitude and false and resolver=apt for the case where none's specified, i.e. previously internal.) Kind regards Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
