On 2011-02-13, Tollef Fog Heen <tfh...@err.no> wrote: > ]] Philipp Kern >| Actually those build failures are nowadays sent to the PTS for further >| distribution (the "buildd" keyword). I don't know how many are subscribed >| to those notifications, though. (After all, they're not automatically >| sent to the maintainer.) > Would people be opposed to changing that? I would be quite happy to get > mails if my packages FTBFS on various architectures, and I believe I'm > competent to at least usually see if something fails because of > something obvious or if it looks like a chroot/buildd issue.
I guess there are (at least) two options: a) Auto-mail the current maintainer as determined by ftp's Maintainers file. Pro: Very easy to setup. Drawback: You'd be unable to opt-out. Furthermore I don't know what the process is to agree on additional mailing of maintainers. b) Auto-subscribe all maintainers to the PTS. Phase out direct mails to the maintainer and switch them over to PTS mailings. I guess that would also apply to dak and debbugs mails. Kind regards Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrnili735.p8.tr...@kelgar.0x539.de
