On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:37:26AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Montag, 24. Januar 2011, Iustin Pop wrote: > > Second, README.test are designed for human consumption, whereas a > > standardisation of how to invoke the tests would allow for much more > > automation. E.g. piuparts would not only be able to test that the > > install succeeds, but the automated tests also work. > > Package: autopkgtest > Description: automatic as-installed testing for Debian packages > autopkgtest runs tests on binary packages. The tests are run on the > package as installed on a testbed system (which may be found via a > virtualisation or containment system). The tests are expected to be > supplied in the corresponding Debian source package. > . > See adt-run(1) and /usr/share/doc/autopkgtest. > Use of adt-virt-xenlvm requires the autopkgtest-xenlvm package too; > Use of the pre-cooked adt-testreport-onepackage script requires curl. > > > I'm happy that you like piuparts, but it's not the best tool for > everything :-)
As I said, "E.g." - for example. Thanks for mentioning autopkgtest, I didn't know about it. iustin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
