On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 05:03:46PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli (lea...@debian.org): > > > varying degrees of flame-ness. Also, still IIRC, the release team has > > already acknowledged that they intend to work on improving various > > aspects of the release process, including communication, for the next > > release cycle. What is then the point of recurrently bringing up this
Actually, maybe one factor of the issue is that we are waiting for $release to be released to start worrying about $release + 1. But I do understand that there may not be enough manpower for that. Or maybe it's just a lack of infrastructure. > IMHO, communication has been really good by the release team, for this > release cycle. I think that most experienced DDs (those who have lived > 1 or 2 releases already) have been well aware of what to do and what > to not do during the last 6 months. Which leaves enough room to help > less experienced DDs about the same. > > So, well, I'm not sure that a big work on communication during the > release process is that needed. I would say, for wheezy, "just do it > as you did for squeeze and we'll be fine". It looks like you forgot what was happening before 6 months ago, which we should really not be reproducing. (and here, mostly, I'm thinking about the time-based freezed announced for december... 2009). Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110109162348.ga11...@glandium.org
