On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> wrote: > Steve Langasek, le Tue 04 Jan 2011 09:34:45 -0800, a écrit : >> I don't agree. dpkg doesn't need to care that /usr/lib/libm.so really >> unpacks to /lib/libm.so due to /usr -> / symlink, > > dpkg doesn't care, but shlibdeps does care, hurd-i386 has been bitten by > that enough to make us give up with /usr -> /.
Why couldn't shlibdeps be fixed? Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
