On Sat, Jan 01, 2011 at 05:11:17PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > For both libgpg-error-dev and libgcrypt11-dev you moved the .so > symlink ,the *.a and *.la libtool files to /lib too. > > My original patch [1] for libcryptsetup (#604936) handled this > diffently. It only moved the *.so.* files to /lib and kept all > devel related files in /usr/lib. This looked like the right way > to me.
For these cases moving the SONAME and the actual file to /lib and keeping the development symlink (.so) along with the static library (.a) in /usr/lib makes sense, particularly if you take into account that the static library might be a large file. Also, note the FHS says "shared library images", not simply "libraries", so no static libraries should be there in the first place. My hunch is "put the .la file in /usr/lib, too" but I haven't looked at libtool internals in a while, so I have no clue as to the effect of having the SONAME and the .la file in different directories. Do note that the .la file does contain information about where the library was meant to be installed. I guess some scripts will break because of this, since it's not usual to have the SONAME in a different directory. My ₡0.02, Marcelo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110101221737.ga17...@esk
