Florian Weimer <f...@deneb.enyo.de> (Sa 18 Dez 2010 21:41:43 CET): > * Heiko Schlittermann: > > > Could this somehow trigger this (unexpected) behaviour of a failing > > validation? But why does it work for somebody (anybody?) else using this > > version of bind? (output of the CHAOS version.bind query: "9.6-ESV-R3") > > Obviously, it works for me, in quite a similar setup (consumer > Internet from Deutsche Telekom, among other things).
Sure, that you've the very same version of bind?
bind9:
Installed: 1:9.6.ESV.R3+dfsg-0+lenny1
Candidate: 1:9.6.ESV.R3+dfsg-0+lenny1
Version table:
*** 1:9.6.ESV.R3+dfsg-0+lenny1 0
990 http://security.debian.org lenny/updates/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
1:9.6.ESV.R1+dfsg-0+lenny2 0
990 http://ftp.de.debian.org lenny/main Packages
On another new installed machine I've the same problem. As long as I
keep the version of bind9.
--
Heiko
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
