On 06/12/10 at 03:33 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 03.12.2010 08:43, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >Hi, > > > >>From time to time, I do archive rebuilds for Ubuntu too, and I thought > >that the results would be interesting for DDs as well, since a FTBFS in > >Ubuntu might indicate that the package will FTBFS in the future in > >Debian, due to toolchain changes for example. > > > >Below is a dd-list of the failures. > > > >The full list and the logs can be found on > >http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/ubuntu_ftbfs.cgi. > > thanks for doing this. The tendency of these reports is correct, > although there are some which are neither reproducible on the Ubuntu > buildds nor with local builds (e.g. apport).
As I already told you on IRC, given that I could make apport fail two times on both i386 and amd64, and provided the build log, I think that the next step is for you to provide a build log, so we can diff them. The one from launchpad is two weeks old and shows significant differences. Like, why does my build try to copy /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/mimetypes/text-x-apport.svg, while the one from launchpad doesn't? Any other unreproducible failures? - Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101206074327.gb5...@xanadu.blop.info
