* Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> schrieb: > * non-distro users -- another issue to watch for while hacking on the > program. As long as they don't modify the autotoolage, they > don't need autotools installed -- and if they did, they do want > to be told what they need instead of their modifications being > silently ignored.
A word from a seasoned maintainer of dozens downstream-branches: Those changes are required most of the time. A single Makefile change requires regeneration. Touching headers/sources often also triggers regeneration (eg. make target deps have to be updated). When dealing w/ crosscompiling, you often have to fix broken configure.ac's, which do stupid assumptions (AC_TRY_RUN,AC_FILE,etc) or the package was generated against an old and totally broken libtool version, and again you'll have to run through the whole regeneration again. So I'm always doing full regeneration (on each build). > * Debian -- building things from the actual source is one of the core rules Please define "actual source". I never considered the autogenerated files as part of the actual source - they're just leftovers for convenience - the actual source of them are files like configure.ac. cu -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weig...@metux.de mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100921103207.ge13...@nibiru.local
