On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:58, gregor herrmann <gre...@debian.org> wrote: > On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:40:49 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > >> with GNUmed we currently have a case where a bug is not RC regarding the >> computer system and would not match our criterion of RC bugs. However, >> the influence of this bug might harm the health of patients of the >> doctor who might use this version of GNUmed. > > Doesn't that simply count as severity: grave - "makes the package in > question unusable or mostly so"? > >> IMHO we should enhance our definition for what >> RC critical means. > > IMO "grave" doesn't only mean "segfaults at start" etc. but also > "produces garbage, shows completely wrong results, doesn't fulfill its > core purpose, ...".
...risks patients' lives, ... Definitely RC, 'grave' severity. -- blog: http://tshepang.tumblr.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=gbox4nmrx457v6qt57dzxcgfy7qeqzce3z...@mail.gmail.com
