6, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Marc Haber <mh+debian-de...@zugschlus.de> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:32:49 -0400, Will <ay1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Additionally, an HTTP interface to reportbug would be a good idea.
>>Many new users find it difficult or unnecessary to set up an MTA when
>>they first install, so allowing to use some kind of HTTP interface
>>would be very nice indeed.
>
> This will decrease the quality of bugs even more since the bug reports
> are not going to contain even the minimum of information collected by
> reportbug.
>
> Greetings
> Marc
> --
> -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
> Marc Haber         |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
> Mannheim, Germany  |     Beginning of Wisdom "     | http://www.zugschlus.de/
> Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1odq0b-0004mg...@swivel.zugschlus.de
>
>

I said HTTP interface. I did not say web interface. I have not
commented on making a web frontend to the BTS. I was suggesting using
HTTP as an alternative transport mechanism since it would require less
configuration on the user's part. Any GUI bug reporter/reportbug could
transmit information to the BTS via HTTP, and it would be easy to slap
a web frontend on top of that if people so desired. It would
definitely easier than building one off of the SMTP interface we have
currently.

-- 
-Will Orr


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=d+a84mwncvukjfl6fkxbagw8bvvup8dp+-...@mail.gmail.com

Reply via email to