On 07/15/2010 09:07 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 19:26 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: >> It's been reported as bug #428189 already, but without any followup. >> See also #532324. > Well while 532324 is a perfect example how some developers obviously > think they can ignore the policy just as they like (this issue is really > unbelievable,... wonder why we have all that policy crap...) in order to > save them work...
Full ack. If the policy does not fit reality, then it should be changed *or* (which is what I'd prefer), the package needs to be fixed. -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer http://bzed.de http://www.debian.org GPG Fingerprints: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79 ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c3f6fbe.9030...@bzed.de
