On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:25:06 +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > Hi! > > * Michael Gilbert <michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com> [2010-06-29 21:50:31 CEST]: > > On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:58:11 +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > > > Am 29.06.2010 17:24, schrieb Michael Gilbert: > > > > > > > No, my proposal is to move the package to a better home: backports. > > > > > > You don't know the current policies WRT packages in backports and about > > > their reasoning, do you? > > > > I believe I do. Backports are for recompilations of unstable packages > > for the stable releases. > > Thanks for excellently stating that you do *not* know about what is > backports about and for, you couldn't have done that better.
The second paragraph on the front page of backports.org says pretty much the same exact thing in different words. > Also, weren't it you who responded to a mail about getting the security > tracker informations straight that it is too much of trouble for you to > check backports informations, too? I fail to see how that would get > better if you want to push more stuff into backports? Yes, and I also stated that if backports were to become an officially supported release, I would adapt my workflow to support it. But until then, it doesn't make sense. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100629165216.a3e20b7d.michael.s.gilb...@gmail.com
