On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 01:13:28AM +0200, sean finney wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:24:48PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Does dbconfig-common know about all of these config files?
> > I think it's the responsibility of dbconfig-common to track them, and remove > > them on purge. That way if your package is purged while dbconfig-common is > > installed, the config file is removed, and if dbconfig-common is removed > > before purge, a dpkg --purge dbconfig-common can still clean it up. > i think in hindsight that's the way it *should* have been, but the > documentation has suggested the contrary for long enough that i'm hesitant > to break things, at least this late into the release cycle. Hmm, what's the risk of changing it? I guess if dependencies are allowed to be purged when a package depending on them is removed-but-not-purged, dbconfig-common could obliterate config files that the depending package expects to still have around. Is that the concern? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100601040250.ga9...@dario.dodds.net