tony mancill <tmanc...@debian.org> wrote: Hi,
> I view the "absolute minimal changes" NMU process as designed for (and > more appropriate for) actively maintained packages. That is, the NMU Either it's a QA upload or it's a NMU, but it can't be "a bit of both". If the package is effectively not maintained anymore, it's up to the MIA team to investigate and eventually decide to orphan the package. This kind of NMUs don't help; they just help the unmaintained stuff fly below the MIA radar longer. JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <jbla...@debian.org> Public key available on <http://www.jblache.org> - KeyID: F5D6 5169 GPG Fingerprint : 935A 79F1 C8B3 3521 FD62 7CC7 CD61 4FD7 F5D6 5169 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87typz4zv9....@sonic.technologeek.org
