On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 01:04:22PM +0200, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Harald Braumann <ha...@unheit.net> wrote: > > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:48:19AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > >> Will be done in base-files 5.4. > > > > I think that this change was done prematurely. There is still the > > issue of a Debian system running in a non-UPG environment. And so far > > I haven't seen a resolution for this point in the discussion. > > I believe the pam umask module is the way to go according to > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/Linux-PAM-html/sag-pam_umask.html > > [opition] usergroups > > If the user is not root, and the user ID is equal to the group ID, > and the username is the same as primary group name, the umask group > bits are set to be the same as owner bits (examples: 022 -> 002, 077 > -> 007).
And it was said in this thread that UID == GID is not always true with UPG. You only need to create a group for that to become false for users you would create afterwards. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100517112604.ga9...@glandium.org
