On Sat, May 08 2010, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On May 07, Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> wrote:
>
>> > - a decision to drop kfreebsd as a release architecture
>> Since 1 and 2 aren't happening, I think we should consider going with
>> the third option.
> Me too, I believe that the people interested in kfreebsd-* have had more
> than enough time to provide the compatibility framework and we cannot
> hold back Debian forever for the benefit of a toy port.
One of my concerns about upstart is that systems that want to
use SELinux and upstart _have_ to also use an initramfs, which is yet
another component of the system that has to be audited. There have
been patches proposed, and semi-rejected b the upstart folks, who are
of the opinions that only systems using initramfs need apply.
The bug report in question is #543420, please read it for the
details (I am arguably biased). I am also willing to re-work the patch
to not link with libsepol, so minimizing the dependencies to
libselinux.
manoj
--
There is always something new out of Africa. Gaius Plinius Secundus
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@acm.org> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
4096R/C5779A1C E37E 5EC5 2A01 DA25 AD20 05B6 CF48 9438 C577 9A1C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87wrvcwxz0....@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com
