Hendrik Sattler, le Wed 05 May 2010 10:47:24 +0200, a écrit : > Zitat von Josselin Mouette <j...@debian.org>: > > >Le mardi 04 mai 2010 à 10:31 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : > >>Sorry I don't know what you're talking about. If you can explain it > >> I'll try to > >>look at the problem. > > > >It’s not a problem, it’s a disagreement over a design choice. > > > >When you do that: > > #include <gtk/gtk.h> > > > >you’re able to use gtk_* functions, but also g_* and pango_* functions, > >because the headers are designed so. > > > >Therefore, when you link to GTK+, you need to link explicitly to Pango > >and GLib. This is why Pango and GLib are in the Requires field for > >gtk+-2.0.pc, and not in Requires.private. > > Only when you use symbols from Pango or Glib directly. Having > prototypes through gtk/gtk.h is not relevant.
A lot of gtk headers use GObjectClass types, macros and such, which are from Glib. You thus need both glib headers and libraries. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100505095109.gf5...@const.bordeaux.inria.fr
